Towards a "World Intellectual Wealth Organisation" 
The Geneva Declaration 
We are convinced that new answers sometimes require new questions, not more careful repetition of old ones. A World Intellectual Property Organization (World Intellectual Property Organization or WIPO) will, understandably, always inclined to the application of that set of pre-selected instruments of monopolization is referred to as 'Intellectual Property', a term that are ideologically charged and dangerously oblivious to the significant differences that exist among the many areas of law that seeks to imply. While 
We need a World Intellectual Wealth Organisation (World Intellectual Wealth), dedicated to research and promotion of novel and imaginative ways to encourage the production and dissemination of knowledge. A guarantee of limited monopolies or limited control over certain types of knowledge can be part of the tools of this new organization, but not the only nor the most important. Amaranta in front of the Skype screen, amazed of the wonders of the blogosphere, began the long series of calls, "handsfree" Tiziaaa, Lorèèèè, Elisèèèè, Tonii, but that 'stuff is? Logos, meanwhile, was busy asking questions existential on how to talk without a microphone. began a frantic search on Google and got lost in the labyrinth of Nietzsche and nihilism among Vattimo. Idea, always very discreet, he turned to San Gennaro, begging him to ask you a favor so things are always good. The answer was a roar of Vesuvius, immediately seized by Miryam, who wrote a poem in praise of the city of Naples. short, after many hours together and decided we will meet in plenary assemlea of \u200b\u200bUtopia in a remote location an hour ..... X.
(From a manuscript typed shorthand, found on a path between HEurope and Utopia, as he was about to be gobbled up by a lame horse named MAHATMA)
The Assembly took the floor
Logos, president and one man team, just back from a hearty lunch, are well disposed to accept suggestions and ideas, stoically also prepares the screening of the most outlandish. In fact, the rule is: quirky tips galore, with concrete proposals that lacks ...... is there!
I had been tipped off about the possibility to advertise the initiative on Facebook and so I can not wait to have others share: cost one euro. But it is precisely the kind of publicity that harasses, instead of bringing recruits to the cause upsetting even those who have already joined, Doris argues, Dr. medication, which they will be of neurosis, particularly those arising from excessive abuse of advertising. We pay the same directly blogger, they will be our pubblcitari. We ship to all with an email including the logo and the message to propagate and the bonus of one euro to spend on eBay. A sort of chain S, Antonio, and while we're at, well ask him the miracle to be able st'impresa. Logos offers ironic.
was a joke! Short Cut Logos 
the Department of Automation and Computer  |
| "False challenge any attempt to establish a theory of truth ..." |
"But if anyone can copy your books and fail to buy them, how you live? " This question is often made, more often than not followed by this remark: "But the copyright is necessary, it must also protect the author." This kind of utterances shows how much smoke and sand the dominant culture (based on the principle of ownership) and the entertainment industry to be able to blow in the public eye. In the media and in our brains is rampant confusion as regards the ideology of copyright and intellectual property, even if the re-emergence of movements and the changes underway are putting in crisis. Is convenient only for thieves and pests of all kinds to pretend that "copyright" and "copyright" are the same, or that the contrast is between "copyright" and "piracy." Not so.The answer is a resounding no. More and more examples show that the logic of "pirated copy = copy sold" of logic has nothing. Otherwise you do not understand why our novel
"Copyleft" (dense untranslatable play on words in Italian) is a philosophy that translates into different types of business licenses, the first of which was the GPL [GNU Public License] free software, created to protect it and prevent someone (Microsoft, to make a name at random) from appropriating and privatizing the results of the work of the liberal community of users (for the uninitiated, free software is "open-source code", making it potentially controlled, modified and improved by the user, either alone or in collaboration with others).
If he had remained free software just result, sooner or later the birds we would put on the industry's clutches. The solution was to turn the copyright
like a sock, to turn an obstacle to free reproduction supreme guarantee of the latter. In a nutshell: I put my copyright, then I am the owner of this work, so take advantage of this power to say that with this you can do whatever you want, you can copy it, spread it, modify it, but you can not prevent someone else to do, that you can not appropriate the and stop circulation, you can not put a copyright on it, because there is already one, it belongs to me, and I'll break your ass.
Specifically: an ordinary citizen, if you do not have the money to buy a book of Wu Ming or will not buy it sight unseen, can easily photocopy it or pass it in a scanner with OCR software, or - Much more convenient solution - download it for free from our website www.wumingfoundation.com. This reproduction is not for profit, and with us. However, if a foreign publisher wants to translate and put on sale in their country, or if a filmmaker wants us to the subject of a film, in which case the use is for profit, then these people have to pay (because it is right that "profit" even the rest of us, that we wrote the book). Returning to the question: are we will not lose money?). It enhances the copyright depressing the copyright, in the face of those who believe they are the same thing. While most publishers have not yet noticed this fact and is still conservative in matters of copyright, is more ideological than commercial questions, but we will not take long to notice. The publisher is not at risk of extinction as the phonographic industry: different logics, different media, different circuits, different the way to fruition, and especially the Publishers have not yet lost my mind, did not react with mass roundups, complaints processes and the great technological revolution that "democratizing" access to the means of reproduction. Until a few years ago it had a CD burner for now is a recording studio, now we have it at home, in our personal computer. Not to mention the peer-to-peer
etc. This is an irreversible change, before which all legislation on intellectual property is obsolescent, it rotting. When copyright was invented three centuries ago, there was no possibility of "private copy" or "not for profit reproduction," because only a publisher competitor had access to printing equipment. All the others could only put his soul in peace and, if they could not buy it, simply give up the books. Copyright was not perceived as anti-social, it was the weapon of a contractor against another, not one against the public. Today the situation has drastically changed, the public is no longer obliged to put his soul in peace, have access to machines (computers, photocopiers etc.). And the copyright is a weapon that fires in the pile. There would also be a different matter to do, moving further upstream: we start from the recognition of the social genesis of knowledge. All ideas that have not been directly or indirectly influenced by the social relations that entertains from the communities they're part of. and then if the Genesis is also the social use must remain so. But this is a subject too long. I hope I explained myself well.
So what are we discussing here? The answer is simple, ethical behavior.
Internet environment Fortunately, it is still the subject of legislative action to regulate the property. In the name of freedom expression of surfers has always defended freedom of expression and writing. I think it should be without prejudice to these principles.
How Long Does A Butterfly Rash Last?
Other Services
addition to Home, we also offer competitively priced Labels, Letterhead bench, Shopper Bags, paper (both luxury and economic).
For information please contact: +39360734581 (Nicola)
In some photos of our labels 
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
What is developing in this blog is the concept of intellectual property related to a written or a work posted and signed on a post. Nothing else.
ranging discussions on the Internet relate mainly to the concept of property generally, including ownership of intellectual ideas. I am for maximum ciscolazione of the latter, without ifs but, and, especially, not that I should always cite the source. Political and social idea why I can make my heard or read by another without having to say who I heard it. In this We are therefore, in my opinion, in an uncharted territory. We are like the pioneers when they enter the unexplored lands.
are categorical, otherwise I would never peeped into the Internet. But the object of contention is the requirement above, but a kind of "ethical behavior" that must hold when a blogger is being "taken" by a writing of others.On my blog there are some ideas expressed. My ideas, ideas that can be found more or less okay with people. If another blogger wrote a post about ideas I posted that I could be proud of, even better if you develop ulteriolmente. But if a blogger copiasse from scratch one of my post and it did bother me that his.The day of Feb. 1 has this goal, awareness of the issue, not a day where it is claimed merely a property in general. I think that this post was a necessary clarification.
Here's what we're discussing here, the appropriation of a job, not the broad sense of the intellectual property, one must always be free and very limited. We are in an unexplored area, came to light by modern technology of expression. On this blog we are doing culture, say new problems, ethics yet to be discovered.
Lorenzo
Some write only because they have enough character not to write. Hanns-Hermann Kersten
(1928 - 1986)
this blog, I believe, now has a connotation, not some property, but the ' General system should now be this. I think it is positive. therefore propose to begin a "campaign" started by our respective blog with a logo to be used as a trademark in that blog is nothing if not copied ago citing a source. I also propose that the first day is spent as a post. always in our consideration blog, perhaps with a link to it. say by 1 February?
Doriana
This is a blog for beginners in the field, but all lovers of writing and, absolutely convinced that the rules should be respected in any case, even if you do not agree, because that is what civil society is based, and especially here in the Blogosphere where it is not possible impose the materiality of the law, as we've come to understand it, mostly as a prohibition (which would, however, aggressive alteration in the structure, philosophical and democratic, NETWORK, on \u200b\u200bself-designed) should be strict compliance with the ethics dictated by the legislature and supported by BLOGTIQUETTE  PROPERTY LAW 'INTELLECTUAL | that regulates and organizes the co-existence of millions of people who arrive here with laws and cultures. If
| No, Blogosphere will never be a colony of Planet Earth, although the desires of the powerful, and the multinationals have tried to put over their greedy hands and keep trying because the greed of power has a deep throat and stomach insatiable. | But here, the laws, can not have them on a personal basis.
ethics and standards of good use:  | Respect - Regardless of pagerank, the reputation and the length of service, remember that behind the platform there is always an individual who deserves our respect from the outset.
| Nobody deserves our envy - the "blog of the neighbor is always the most beautiful" that does not mean that ours is the ugliest! Please avoid to exclude from their lectures anyone who has the talent: each of us has always something to learn from the other and copy the style of others may prove as helpful at the beginning of the activities of bloggers as compelling for our creativity with the passing of time: Practice Makes Perfect. |
were created in the United States by the non-profit Creative Commons 
In summary what we write on this blog is automatically published on 
